6-2MBA 699 Report: Risk Analysis MBA 699 Module Six Report Guidelines and RubricOverview In your role as a business development manager involved in preparing an exit strategy for the life science org Original Papers

6-2MBA 699  Report: Risk Analysis

MBA 699 Module Six Report Guidelines and RubricOverview

In your role as a business development manager involved in preparing an exit strategy for the life science organization, you learned that employee attrition is one of the key risks to the proposed acquisition. In Milestone Two, you analyzed the employee data to evaluate this attrition risk and suggest retention strategies to mitigate it. Later, as you began preparing for the exit, the organization faced another challenge—the possibility of the buyer withdrawing from the sale. To mitigate this risk, you searched and planned for alternative buyers.

Management now wants to be more cautious about such risks. To avoid more unforeseen challenges in the process, the vice president (VP) wants you to identify and assess other current or potential risks the organization may face due to the proposed acquisition and recommend strategies to mitigate them.

In this assignment, you will perform a risk assessment using the fishbone method you learned about in this module.

Prompt

Write a report for the VP with risk assessment and mitigation recommendations for the organization in the scenario and its exit strategy.

Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:

1. Risk Identification: Apply the fishbone method to analyze two other risks or problems the organization is facing. Your response should include the following:
2. Risk Evaluation:
3. Risk Mitigation: Recommend one way to mitigate each identified risk or problem. Support your response.

What to Submit

Submit a 2- to 4-page Word document using double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Sources should be cited according to APA style. Consult the Shapiro Library APA Style Guide for more information on citations.

Module Six Report RubricCriteriaExceeds Expectations (100%)Meets Expectations (90%)Partially Meets Expectations (70%)Does Not Meet Expectations (0%)ValueRisk IdentificationExceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative mannerIdentifies two risks or problems to be resolved and creates a fishbone diagram for each, and identifies one main cause and ancillary causes for each risk or problemShows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include identifying two relevant risks or problems, effectively using a fishbone diagram to analyze risks or problems, or identifying appropriate main and ancillary causes for each risk or problemDoes not attempt criterion20Risk Evaluation: Probability and ImpactExceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative mannerEvaluates the probability and impact of each identified risk or problem as low, medium, or highShows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include appropriately evaluating probability and impact of each identified risk or problemDoes not attempt criterion15Risk Evaluation: JustificationExceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative mannerJustifies evaluation of the impact and probability of each identified risk or problem and provides rationale with supporting dataShows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include providing appropriate justification for each identified risk or problem or the use of data to support this justificationDoes not attempt criterion15Risk MitigationExceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative mannerRecommends one way to mitigate each identified risk or problem and supports responseShows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include providing appropriate ways to mitigate each identified risk or problemDoes not attempt criterion30Clear CommunicationExceeds expectations with an intentional use of language that promotes a thorough understandingConsistently and effectively communicates in an organized way to a specific audienceShows progress toward meeting expectations, but communication is inconsistent or ineffective in a way that negatively impacts understandingShows no evidence of consistent, effective, or organized communication15Citations and AttributionsUses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with few or no minor errorsUses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with consistent minor errorsUses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with major errorsDoes not use citations for ideas requiring attribution5Total:100%