Assignment Criteria |
Meets Criteria |
Partially Meets Criteria |
Does Not Meet Criteria |
(Introduction – see note under requirement #4 above)
(8 pts)
|
Shortintroduction of selected BSNsub-competencies (AACN, 2008) pertinent to scholarship for evidence-based practice. Rationale is well presented, and purpose fully developed.
7 – 8 points
|
Basic understanding and/or limited use of original explanation and/or inappropriate emphasis on an area.
5 – 6 points
|
Little or very general introduction of selected BSNsub-competencies (AACN, 2008). Little to no original explanation; inappropriate emphasis on an area.
0 – 4 points
|
You Decide Reflection
(80 pts)
|
Excellent self-assessment of skills, knowledge, and integrative abilities pertinent to healthcare policy and advocacy. Reflection on pertinent BSNsub-competencies (AACN, 2008) supported with examples.
70 – 80 points
|
Basic self-assessment of skills, knowledge, and integrative abilities pertinent to healthcare policy and advocacy. Reflection on pertinent BSNsub-competencies (AACN, 2008) not supported with examples.
59 – 69 points
|
Little or very general self-assessment of skills, knowledge, and integrative abilities pertinent to healthcare policy and advocacy. Little or no reflection on pertinent BSNsub-competencies (AACN, 2008) or reflection not supported with examples.
0 – 58 points
|
Conclusion
(4 pts)
|
Excellent understanding of pertinent BSNsub- competencies (AACN, 2008). Conclusions are well evidenced and fully developed.
3 – 4 points
|
Basic understanding and/or limited use of original explanation and/or inappropriate emphasis on an area.
2 points
|
Little understanding of pertinent BSNsub-competencies (AACN, 2008). Little to no original explanation; inappropriate emphasis on an area.
0 – 1 point
|
Clarity of writing
(6 pts)
|
Excellent use of standard English showing original thought with minimal reliance on the works of others. No spelling or grammar errors. Well organized with proper flow of meaning.
5 – 6 points
|
Some evidence of own expression and competent use of language. No more than three spelling or grammar errors. Well organized thoughts and concepts.
3 – 4 points
|
Language needs development or there is an over-reliance on the works of others. Four or more spelling and/or grammar errors. Poorly organized thoughts and concepts.
0 – 2 points
|
APA format
(2 pts)
|
APA format correct with no more than 1-2 minor errors.
2 points
|
3-5 errors in APA format and/or 1-2 citations are missing.
1 point
|
APA formatting contains multiple errors and/or several citations are missing.
0 points
|
Total Points Possible = 100 points |