Evidence based practice and the quadruple aim

Evidence based practice and the quadruple aim

Healthcare organizations continually seek to optimize healthcare performance. For years, this approach was a three-pronged one known as the Triple Aim, with efforts focused on improved population health, enhanced patient experience, and lower healthcare costs.

Don’t use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Evidence based practice and the quadruple aim
Just from $13/Page

Order Essay

More recently, this approach has evolved to a Quadruple Aim by including a focus on improving the work life of healthcare providers. Each of these measures are impacted by decisions made at the organizational level, and organizations have increasingly turned to EBP to inform and justify these decisions.

To Prepare:

  • Read the articles by Sikka, Morath, & Leape (2015); Crabtree, Brennan, Davis, & Coyle (2016); and Kim et al. (2016) provided in the Resources.
  • Reflect on how EBP might impact (or not impact) the Quadruple Aim in healthcare.
  • Consider the impact that EBP may have on factors impacting these quadruple aim elements, such as preventable medical errors or healthcare delivery.

To Complete:

Write a brief analysis (no longer than 2 pages) of the connection between EBP and the Quadruple Aim.

Your analysis should address how EBP might (or might not) help reach the Quadruple Aim, including each of the four measures of:

  • Patient experience
  • Population health
  • Costs
  • Work life of healthcare providers

By Day 7 of Week 1

Submit your analysis.

 

RUBRIC below:

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Excellent Good Fair Poor
Write a brief analysis of the connection between evidence-based practice and the Quadruple Aim. Your analysis should address how evidence-based practice might (or might not) help reach the Quadruple Aim, including each of the four measures of: 

· Patient experience
· Population health
· Costs
· Work life of healthcare providers

77 (77%) – 85 (85%) 

The analysis clearly and accurately addresses in detail how evidence-based practice either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim.

The analysis accurately and thoroughly explains in detail how the four measures of patient experience, population health, costs, and work-life of healthcare providers either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim.

The analysis provides a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources reviewed on the four measures supporting or not supporting the Quadruple Aim. The response fully integrates at least two outside resources and two or three course-specific resources that fully support the analysis provided with credible and detailed examples.

68 (68%) – 76 (76%) 

The analysis accurately addresses how evidence-based practice either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim.

The analysis accurately explains how the four measures of patient experience, population health, and work life of healthcare providers either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim.

The analysis provides an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource reviewed on the four measures supporting or not supporting the Quadruple Aim. The response integrates at least 1 outside resource and two or three course-specific resources that may support the analysis provided and may include some detailed examples.

60 (60%) – 67 (67%) 

The analysis inaccurately or vaguely addresses how evidence-based practice either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim.

The analysis inaccurately or vaguely explains how the four measures of patient experience, population health, and work life of healthcare providers either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim.

The analysis provides an inaccurate or vague analysis of the four measures supporting or not supporting the Quadruple Aim with a vague or inaccurate analysis of outside resources. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the analysis provided and may include vague or inaccurate examples.

0 (0%) – 59 (59%) 

The analysis inaccurately and vaguely addresses how evidence-based practice either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim or is missing.

The analysis inaccurately and vaguely explains how the four measures of patient experience, population health, and work life of healthcare providers either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim or is missing.

The analysis provides a vague and inaccurate analysis of the four measures supporting or not supporting the Quadruple Aim with a vague and inaccurate analysis of outside resources. The response fails to integrate any resources to support the analysis provided or is missing.

Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.
5 (5%) – 5 (5%) 

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%) 

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated yet is brief and not descriptive.

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) 

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%) 

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.

No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.
5 (5%) – 5 (5%) 

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%) 

Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) 

Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%) 

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

Written Expression and Formatting—The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) 

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%) 

Contains a few (one or two) APA format errors.

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) 

Contains several (three or four) APA format errors.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%) 

Contains many (five or more) APA format errors.

Total Points: 100

 

 

 

Evidence-Based Practice and the Quadruple Aim

Evidence-based practice (EBP) involves use of the best available scientific evidence in clinical setting to formulate public policies and in nursing practice. Health professionals use EBP to solve problems and making healthcare decisions by integrating scientific studies, patient preference and values, clinician’s experiences and expertise (Morrow et al., 2018). EBP is used by organizations to ensure they provide high quality, safe, and efficient healthcare services.

To ensure success of EBP, it is recommended that an inter-professional model is adopted in decision making and implementation. Crabtree et al (2016) asserts that nurses have embraced a positive attitude towards EBP and are ready to obtain necessary skills set for implementation of EBP into clinical practice.

Quadruple aim is made up of four objectives including improvement of patient experience, population health, healthcare workers work-life, and lowering healthcare costs (Laskowski-Jones, 2016). These objectives accomplished through redesigning of healthcare facilities to lower healthcare costs and at the same time to improve population health through efficiency and effectiveness.

Batcheller et al (2017) asserted that to achieve success in implementation of EBP and meet objectives of the quadruple aim, it is necessary to have adequate and healthy workforce. Healthy workforce promoted transformation of triple aim to quadruple aim where a fourth goal (improvement of healthcare workers work-life) was incorporated.

Impact of EBP on Factors influencing Quadruple Aim Elements

Adoption of EBP is to improve healthcare quality and has an impact on work-life of healthcare providers. This is because healthcare providers need to be highly productive to offer healthcare services that are of good quality and safe. In addition, EBP patient experiences, population health and healthcare costs as discussed below.

 Patient experience

Healthcare workers use EBP by translating the research findings into clinical practice based on individual patient needs (Kim et al., 2016). Successful development and implementation leads to improvement of quality of healthcare received by patients. With increasing adoption of EBP among healthcare organizations to solve clinical issues, patient care improves and in turn patient experiences.

Population health

EBP aims at educating population on cultural healthcare practices, personal health determinants, advantages, and disadvantages of particular treatments. According to Morrow et al (2018), integration of EBP in different populations aims at ensuring that resources ate distributed equitably to accomplish set aim.

When implementing EBP, populations are classified according to their needs which are identified using socio-economic status, health status, and family support. This is done to promote equitability in resource allocation. EPB processes are designed to address individual health needs and preferences.

Costs

Sikka et al (2016) asserted that healthcare facilities experience challenges in measuring of healthcare costs per capita. One major method organizations use to measure actual healthcare costs is through discounting and pricing. It is challenging to offer quality and safe healthcare services at lower costs. Therefore, organizations have embraced use of modern technologies to improve efficacy in healthcare services delivery and treatment methods as discovered through EBP. This has increased the quality and cost of healthcare services.

The Work-life of Healthcare Providers

A healthcare environment that is conducive supports inter-professional collaboration and teamwork. Empirical studies have shown that inter-professional collaboration improves patient health outcomes and leads to job satisfaction among healthcare providers (Batcheller et al., 2017).

In addition, it reduces fatigue, staff turn-over rates, and increases motivation at work which promotes staff productivity. A conducive work environment supports engagement of workforce in shared decision making and competitive remuneration. This promotes positive work-life among healthcare providers.  In summary, it is necessary to examine the impact of EBP on factors influencing quadruple aim to make necessary adjustments.

References

Batcheller, J., Zimmermann, D., Pappas, S., & Adams, J. M. (2017). Nursing’s leadership role in addressing the quadruple aim. Nurse Leader15(3), 203-206.

Crabtree, E., Brennan, E., Davis, A., & Coyle, A. (2016). Improving Patient Care Through Nursing Engagement in Evidence‐Based Practice. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing13(2), 172-175.

Laskowski-Jones, L. (2016). Finding joy and meaning in work: In support of the “Quadruple Aim”.

Kim, S. C., Stichler, J. F., Ecoff, L., Brown, C. E., Gallo, A. M., & Davidson, J. E. (2016). Predictors of evidence‐based practice implementation, job satisfaction, and group cohesion among regional fellowship program participants. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing13(5), 340-348.

Morrow, E., Call, M., Marcus, R., & Locke, A. (2018). Focus on the quadruple aim: development of a resiliency center to promote faculty and staff wellness initiatives. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety44(5), 293-298.

Sikka, R., Morath, J. M., & Leape, L. (2015). The quadruple aim: care, health, cost and meaning in work.

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more