Bioethics Case Study
1.
1. Bioethics Case Study: This assignment asks you to examine a current ethical controversy case study. The paper is informal, but should be in APA style, and does not need an abstract or cover page. With a minimum of two pages and a maximum of four pages A reference page is needed. In-text citations should be in APA format. Papers will be graded on a 0 to 25-point scale.
Case Study in Primary care:
One hypothetical case study involves Jim a 54, year old patient who has recently diagnose with hypertension and his Creatinine and BUN laboratory results are elevated, if left untreated, will result in kidney failure. The patient refuses to take the medication because he said it will affect his sex life The NP must work with the patient to respect the fact that he doesn’t want the medication (autonomy), and needs to find a solution that would prevent him from going into kidney failure and other complications, which is in his best interest (beneficence). Although medications are the best choice, forcing the patient to accept the medication will result in probably patient leaving the care (non-maleficence). Finally, the NP needs to consider the impact that the patient’s choices might have on others if he starts to go into preventable kidney failure, he’ll need dialysis, which affects other people who need the same treatment (justice). So before making the final decision the NP must consider all four principles of health care ethics, which will help the NP make the choice that will have the best possible benefits for both the patient and society.
Questions?
1. What are the skills necessary for the provider to identify, address, and assess this clinical ethical issue?
2. What are the provider’s obligations when a patient discloses does he not intent to follow the treatment?
3. What are the ethical considerations in evaluating a patient’s failure to adhere to a prescribed therapy?
4. Will you terminate care for this patient? What are the implications?
Case Study Rubric
| Criterion | Outstanding (25) | Very Good (22) | Average (18) | Unacceptable (15) | Score |
| Completeness | Complete in all respects; reflects all requirements | Complete in most respects; reflects most requirements | Incomplete many respects; reflects few requirements | Incomplete in most respects; does not reflect requirements | |
| Understanding | Demonstrates excellent understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s) | Demonstrates an accomplished understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s) | Demonstrates an acceptable understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s) | Demonstrates an inadequate understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s) | |
| Analysis | Presents an insightful and through analysis of the issue (s) identified | Presents a thorough analysis of most of the issue(s) identified | Presents a superficial analysis of some of the issue(s) identified | Presents an incomplete analysis of the issue(s) identified. | |
| Evaluation | Makes appropriate and powerful connections between the issue(s) identified and the concept(s) studied | Makes appropriate connections between the issue(s) identified and the concept(s) studied | Makes appropriate but somewhat vague connections between the issue(s) identified and the concept(s) studied | Makes little or no connection between the issue(s) identified and the concept(s) studied. | |
| Opinion | Supports opinion with strong arguments and evidence; presents a balanced and critical view; interpretation is both reasonable and objective | Supports opinion with reasons and evidence; presents a fairly balanced view; interpretation is both reasonable and objective | Supports opinion with limited reasons and evidence; presents a somewhat one-sided argument | Supports opinion with few reasons and little evidence; argument is one-sided and not objective. | |
| Recommendations | Presents detailed, realistic, and appropriate recommendations clearly supported by the information presented and concepts studied | Presents specific, realistic and appropriate recommendation supported by the information presented and the concepts studied | Presents realistic or appropriate recommendation supported by the information presented and the concepts studied | Presents realistic or appropriate recommendation with little, if any, support from the information and the concepts studied. | |
| Grammar and Spelling | Minimal spelling and grammar errors | Some spelling and grammar errors | Noticeable spelling and grammar errors | Unacceptable number of spelling and grammar errors | |
| APA guidelines | Uses APA guidelines accurately and consistently to cite sources | Uses APA guidelines with minor violations to cite sources | Reflects incomplete knowledge of APA guidelines | Does not use APA guidelines |
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more